Filters
Question type
A) Messages can be sent quicker and are more sincere.
B) Messages are less distorted or affected by noise.
C) Messages are more believable and trustable.
D) Messages can be planned, contemplated, and edited to be more mindful and deliberate.
E) A) and B)
F) A) and C)
F) A) and C)
Correct Answer
verified
Correct Answer
verified
A) True
B) False
B) False
Correct Answer
verified
Correct Answer
verified
Correct Answer
Answered by ExamLex AI
A hyperpersonal relationship is a concept that originates from the hyperpersonal model of communication, which was introduced by Joseph Walther in 1996. This model suggests that online interactions can sometimes become more intimate and intense than face-to-face relationships due to the unique aspects of computer-mediated communication (CMC).
In a hyperpersonal relationship, the participants often share a high level of self-disclosure, emotional connection, and intimacy that may surpass what is typically found in traditional relationships. This can happen for several reasons:
1. Selective Self-Presentation: Online environments allow individuals to carefully craft and control how they present themselves. This can lead to an idealized version of oneself being projected, which may be more attractive to the other person.
2. Over-attribution of Similarity: Due to the lack of nonverbal cues and the piecemeal exchange of information, individuals may fill in the gaps with assumptions that the other person is more similar to them than they actually are, leading to a stronger sense of connection.
3. Idealization: With limited information, people tend to idealize their communication partners, attributing positive qualities to them that may not be evident in a face-to-face setting.
4. Feedback Loop: The positive reinforcement received through CMC can encourage individuals to continue the cycle of self-disclosure and intimacy, further deepening the relationship.
Hyperpersonal relationships can develop in various online settings, such as social media, dating sites, chat rooms, and gaming platforms. While these relationships can be deeply meaningful and fulfilling, they also carry the risk of misrepresentation and disappointment if the parties eventually meet in person and the reality does not match the idealized online personas.
It's important to note that hyperpersonal relationships are not inherently good or bad; they are simply a different form of relationship that can develop under the influence of computer-mediated communication dynamics.
Correct Answer
Answered by ExamLex AI
A hyperpersonal relationship is a concept that originates from the hyperpersonal model of communication, which was introduced by Joseph Walther in 1996. This model suggests that online interactions can sometimes become more intimate and intense than face-to-face relationships due to the unique aspects of computer-mediated communication (CMC).
In a hyperpersonal relationship, the participants often share a high level of self-disclosure, emotional connection, and intimacy that may surpass what is typically found in traditional relationships. This can happen for several reasons:
1. Selective Self-Presentation: Online environments allow individuals to carefully craft and control how they present themselves. This can lead to an idealized version of oneself being projected, which may be more attractive to the other person.
2. Over-attribution of Similarity: Due to the lack of nonverbal cues and the piecemeal exchange of information, individuals may fill in the gaps with assumptions that the other person is more similar to them than they actually are, leading to a stronger sense of connection.
3. Idealization: With limited information, people tend to idealize their communication partners, attributing positive qualities to them that may not be evident in a face-to-face setting.
4. Feedback Loop: The positive reinforcement received through CMC can encourage individuals to continue the cycle of self-disclosure and intimacy, further deepening the relationship.
Hyperpersonal relationships can develop in various online settings, such as social media, dating sites, chat rooms, and gaming platforms. While these relationships can be deeply meaningful and fulfilling, they also carry the risk of misrepresentation and disappointment if the parties eventually meet in person and the reality does not match the idealized online personas.
It's important to note that hyperpersonal relationships are not inherently good or bad; they are simply a different form of relationship that can develop under the influence of computer-mediated communication dynamics.
Correct Answer
verified
Correct Answer
verified
A) True
B) False
B) False
Correct Answer
verified
Correct Answer
verified
A) True
B) False
B) False
Correct Answer
verified
Correct Answer
verified
A) warranting
B) hedging
C) attacking
D) flaming
E) A) and D)
F) None of the above
F) None of the above
Correct Answer
verified
Correct Answer
verified
Correct Answer
verified
Correct Answer
verified
Correct Answer
Answered by ExamLex AI
Both social penetration theory and socia...View Answer
Correct Answer
Answered by ExamLex AI
Both social penetration theory and socia...
View Answer
Correct Answer
Answered by ExamLex AI
The four-to-one time differential betwee...View Answer
Correct Answer
Answered by ExamLex AI
The four-to-one time differential betwee...
View Answer
Correct Answer
Answered by ExamLex AI
The Social Identity Theory (SIP), developed by Henri Tajfel and John Turner in the 1970s, is a psychological framework that describes how individuals categorize themselves and others into groups, leading to a sense of belonging and identity. The theory suggests that people derive their identity from the groups they belong to, and these group identifications can influence attitudes and behavior towards in-group and out-group members.
As with any scientific theory, SIP should be falsifiable, which means it should be possible to conceive of an observation or an argument which could negate it. Falsifiability is a key criterion for a theory to be considered scientific, as proposed by philosopher Karl Popper. A theory must make predictions that can be tested and potentially proven wrong through empirical observation or experimentation.
To falsify SIP, one would need to find consistent, reproducible evidence that group categorization does not affect individuals' self-identity, attitudes, or behaviors in the way the theory predicts. This could involve demonstrating that individuals do not show favoritism towards members of their own group (in-group bias) or that they do not discriminate against members of other groups (out-group discrimination) in situations where the theory would predict such behaviors.
For example, if a series of well-designed studies showed that people do not consistently favor their in-group when it comes to resource allocation, decision-making, or interpersonal evaluations, despite clear group boundaries and identification, this could challenge the validity of SIP. Similarly, if individuals consistently did not seek to enhance their self-image through group membership, or if group membership did not influence their self-esteem, this could also serve as evidence against the theory.
However, it is important to note that SIP is supported by a substantial body of empirical research. Numerous studies have demonstrated in-group favoritism and out-group discrimination across various contexts, lending support to the theory. While individual studies might yield results that seem to contradict SIP, the theory would only be seriously challenged if a significant and consistent body of evidence emerged that could not be explained by the theory's framework.
In conclusion, while SIP, like any scientific theory, should be falsifiable in principle, the current evidence largely supports its predictions. To falsify SIP, one would need to present clear, empirical evidence that contradicts the core predictions of the theory regarding the impact of group identification on attitudes and behaviors.
Correct Answer
Answered by ExamLex AI
The Social Identity Theory (SIP), developed by Henri Tajfel and John Turner in the 1970s, is a psychological framework that describes how individuals categorize themselves and others into groups, leading to a sense of belonging and identity. The theory suggests that people derive their identity from the groups they belong to, and these group identifications can influence attitudes and behavior towards in-group and out-group members.
As with any scientific theory, SIP should be falsifiable, which means it should be possible to conceive of an observation or an argument which could negate it. Falsifiability is a key criterion for a theory to be considered scientific, as proposed by philosopher Karl Popper. A theory must make predictions that can be tested and potentially proven wrong through empirical observation or experimentation.
To falsify SIP, one would need to find consistent, reproducible evidence that group categorization does not affect individuals' self-identity, attitudes, or behaviors in the way the theory predicts. This could involve demonstrating that individuals do not show favoritism towards members of their own group (in-group bias) or that they do not discriminate against members of other groups (out-group discrimination) in situations where the theory would predict such behaviors.
For example, if a series of well-designed studies showed that people do not consistently favor their in-group when it comes to resource allocation, decision-making, or interpersonal evaluations, despite clear group boundaries and identification, this could challenge the validity of SIP. Similarly, if individuals consistently did not seek to enhance their self-image through group membership, or if group membership did not influence their self-esteem, this could also serve as evidence against the theory.
However, it is important to note that SIP is supported by a substantial body of empirical research. Numerous studies have demonstrated in-group favoritism and out-group discrimination across various contexts, lending support to the theory. While individual studies might yield results that seem to contradict SIP, the theory would only be seriously challenged if a significant and consistent body of evidence emerged that could not be explained by the theory's framework.
In conclusion, while SIP, like any scientific theory, should be falsifiable in principle, the current evidence largely supports its predictions. To falsify SIP, one would need to present clear, empirical evidence that contradicts the core predictions of the theory regarding the impact of group identification on attitudes and behaviors.
A) Mindfulness
B) Attribution
C) Pragmatism
D) Hedging
E) B) and D)
F) B) and C)
F) B) and C)
Correct Answer
verified
B
Correct Answer
verified
B
Correct Answer
Answered by ExamLex AI
In the absence of nonverbal cues, verbal...View Answer
Correct Answer
Answered by ExamLex AI
In the absence of nonverbal cues, verbal...
View Answer
Correct Answer
Answered by ExamLex AI
In relationships developed through onlin...View Answer
Correct Answer
Answered by ExamLex AI
In relationships developed through onlin...
View Answer
Correct Answer
Answered by ExamLex AI
Interpersonal information, impression fo...View Answer
Correct Answer
Answered by ExamLex AI
Interpersonal information, impression fo...
View Answer
A) relationship development
B) relationship maintenance
C) self-image construction
D) self-concept development
E) A) and C)
F) A) and B)
F) A) and B)
Correct Answer
verified
Correct Answer
verified
Correct Answer
Answered by ExamLex AI
Walther's empirical research of SIP theo...View Answer
Correct Answer
Answered by ExamLex AI
Walther's empirical research of SIP theo...
View Answer
A) personalization of message content
B) extended time
C) increased amount of social information conveyed
D) directness of messages
E) A) and B)
F) A) and C)
F) A) and C)
Correct Answer
verified
Correct Answer
verified
A) True
B) False
B) False
Correct Answer
verified
Correct Answer
verified
A) True
B) False
B) False
Correct Answer
verified
Correct Answer
verified
Showing 1 - 20 of 35
Related Exams